Victorian Government Belt And Road Agreement

The Belt and Road deal has been heavily criticised by Mr Andrews` critics and has fuelled conspiracy theories, with his government having been the subject of intense spotlight during the second wave of coronavirus. If the agreement is not the national test of interest, the Minister of Foreign Affairs may prevent the company from negotiating, entering, maintaining or entering into force of the agreement. „Australians are right to expect that the federal government that elects them will not have foreign policy before. These changes and new laws will ensure that any agreement reached by an Australian government at all levels is now classified as the way we work to protect and promote Australia`s national interests. Asked whether, under the agreement, Victoria should play a greater role in Australia-China relations, Pearson said the federal government had „made it clear that it wants to play a dominant role on these issues from a foreign policy perspective.“ If necessary, the government could obtain an injunction from the Federal Court or the Supreme Court to enforce the Minister of Foreign Affairs` decision. But when asked if he was rethinking the Belt and Road deal, given its posting on Twitter and the aggressive escalation of Chinese rhetoric since then, the prime minister had a one-word answer: „No.“ „Victoria needs to explain why it is the only state in the country to have reached this agreement,“ he said. Some of the legislation was stopped last week after Labor backed an amendment that would have allowed for judicial review, but the coalition government defeated him in the House of Representatives and sent him back to the Senate. The law passed Tuesday, with Senator Jacqui Lambie changing her voice. Nothing. It is not a legally binding agreement, but until now, the Victorian government has not turned away from it. Victoria`s Belt and Road Accords could be torn apart if new foreign interference laws pass through the federal parliament. In 2018, Prime Minister Daniel Andrews signed a Memorandum of Understanding with China`s National Development and Reform Commission to work together on Silk Road initiatives.

Many Western countries, especially the United States, are wary of China`s motivations behind the BRI. The initiative is rejected in order to eliminate any risk of Chinese cooperatives operating under the BRI in order to gather valuable information for the Chinese government. For example, Huawei Technologies Co., a Chinese telecommunications company, has been banned from facilitating Australia`s 5G infrastructure because of the high risk it poses to report to Beijing. The P.M., who sees no reason to sign the non-binding MUO, clearly testifies to the country`s great distrust and caution towards the initiative. Thus, Victoria`s consent to the BRI is directly out of step with the federal government and has created conflicting interests for Australia. The relentless pursuit of state involvement in the initiative has not only frustrated the federal government, but has also lost the support of Prime Minister Daniel Andrews` Labour colleagues. Victoria`s second wave of Covid 19 only invoked the federal government to scrutiny Andrew`s decision-making. In the end, the prime minister`s partnership with China has severely compromised his long-term service in its current position. With China imposing trade restrictions that threaten Australian exports by up to $20 billion, state opposition has questioned the benefits of the deal, but Andrews said he would not have struck the deal if he didn`t believe it was in Victoria`s best interest.

There has been a bitter rift between the Australian federal government and the state of Victoria over admission to the BRI…