An enterprise may also use the internal model used for the internal approach of the framework user agreement1 for Margin credit transactions where the transactions are covered by the approval of the framework clearing agreement for the company`s internal models and the transactions are covered by a bilateral master clearing agreement that meets the requirements of BIPRU 13.7. Close-out compensation occurs after default if a party does not pay principal and interest. Transactions between the two parties are cleared to obtain a single amount that either party of the other can pay. During the close-out compensation, existing contracts are terminated and an aggregated final value is calculated and paid as a lump sum. An entity may use the internal models approach of the non-framework contract, regardless of the choice it has made between the standardised approach and the RN approach for the calculation of weighted exposure amounts. However, where an entity uses the internal model approach of the non-framework contract, it must do so for all counterparties and securities, with the exception of intangible portfolios, for which it may use the prudential volatility adjustments approach or the „own estimates of volatility adjustments“ approach in accordance with BIPRU 5.4.30 R to PIBRU 5.4.65 R. Instead of sending two payments, Company B with bilateral compensation would send $2,083.33 ($833.33 + $1,250) or $25,000 ($10,000 + $15,000 per year) each month. Multilateral clearing consists of more than two parties, probably through a clearing house or central exchange, while bilateral clearing is between two parties. An entity shall calculate, in accordance with the standardised approach, the weighted exposure amounts for repurchase transactions and/or securities or commodity lending operations and/or other capital market-oriented operations covered by support framework agreements under this Rule. The payment is not equal when each counterparty aggregates the amount due to the other on the day of payment and only the difference between the amounts and the figure is provided by the party. This is also called settlement clearing. Payment Netting reduces settlement risk, but as all initial swaps are maintained, it does not achieve clearing for regulatory capital or balance sheet purposes. Foreign currency clearing allows companies or banks to consolidate the number of currencies and conclude foreign exchange transactions with larger trades and enjoy the benefits of better pricing.
. . .