Eu Norway Fishing Agreement

We believe that the UK will seek greater control of fishing in its own EEZ, a right it has in accordance with UNCLOS, and some species may be subject to higher quotas. Nevertheless, quota and access agreements are expected to evolve gradually. No agreement could be destructive to the North Sea`s fisheries resources, with cod and herring being the most vulnerable: cod, as the stock size is very small at the outset; Herring because, as a type of school, it is particularly vulnerable to overfishing. Talks between the EU and Norway on fishing quotas for 2010 failed on Tuesday evening. HOLDER COMPTE of the fact that Norway has set up, effective 1 January 1977, an economic zone extending up to 200 nautical miles off its coast, in which Norway exercises high sovereign rights to explore, exploit the resources of these resources, and that the Community has agreed that the limits of its Member States` fishing areas (hereafter referred to as the Community Fisheries Jurisdiction Zone) are limited to 200 nautical miles. , fishing within these limits is subject to the Community`s common fisheries policy; The third group, mackerel and blue whiting (17%), is managed by coastal state agreements covering the entire Northeast Atlantic. Finally, „others“ (23%) are stocks that become Norwegian, British, EU-27 or common stocks. „This is the established model of cooperation between coastal states that have common stocks to ensure that fish stocks are harvested responsibly and sustainably. Annual agreements provide the flexibility to deal with changes in stocks and science, while the framework agreement ensures continuity and a framework for cooperation,“ said Barrie Deas, NFFO`s Managing Director. When setting catch allocations under Article 2, paragraph 1, point b), of the agreement, the parties aim to achieve a satisfactory balance for both parties in their mutual fishing relations. Subject to conservation requirements, a satisfactory balance for both parties should be based on Norwegian fishing in the Community Fisheries Jurisdiction Area in recent years.

The contracting parties acknowledge that this objective will require a corresponding change in EU fishing activities in Norwegian waters. The European Commission has said it will not rule on the collapse, but has previously said it does not agree that it has violated the agreement and believes Norway is trying to enter its part of the sea. Britain says that after the transition is over, an independent coastal state will give it back control of who has access to British fishing waters – a government commitment that Barrie Deas, the chief executive of the National Federation of Fisheries Organising, has described as „clear and unequivocal.“ It also shows from this document that the United Kingdom and Norway have entered into an access agreement allowing each contracting party to allow access to its area of jurisdiction to vessels flying the other party`s flag for fishing purposes. The scope and conditions of this access are the subject of annual consultations between the parties. Mr Ingebrigtsen also welcomed an agreement. It`s „a great day,“ he said. The management agreement has been stable for more than 40 years, with quotas unchanged. Nevertheless, cooperative leadership has not been entirely successful. Negotiations between the UK and the EU on a fisheries agreement are proving difficult and could fail.

Mackerel is proving to be the main drop-off point, as the EU and Norway are unable to agree on fishing quotas for 2010.